Screener
BOTZ vs HEAL
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF vs Global X HealthTech ETF
Key differences
- HEAL costs 0.18% less per year.
- BOTZ is significantly larger than HEAL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, BOTZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BOTZ | HEAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.4B | $25M |
| Since | 2016 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 0.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.3% | -20.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | -10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.8% | -14.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | -0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.09% | 21.71% |
| Max drawdown | -55.54% | -65.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BOTZ and HEAL
Explore further