Screener
BOTZ vs IPAV
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF vs Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF
Key differences
- IPAV costs 0.13% less per year.
- BOTZ is significantly larger than IPAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BOTZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BOTZ | IPAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.4B | $5M |
| Since | 2016 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 1.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.3% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.09% | 16.97% |
| Max drawdown | -55.54% | -14.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BOTZ and IPAV
Explore further