Screener
BPAY vs IXN
iShares FinTech Active ETF vs iShares Global Tech ETF
Key differences
- IXN costs 0.16% less per year.
- IXN is significantly larger than BPAY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BPAY is classified as alternative, while IXN is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BPAY follows a active selection strategy; IXN uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IXN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BPAY | IXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $7.8B |
| Since | 2022 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | 0.28% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -5.8% | +63.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.7% | +35.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +22.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.36 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.59% | 21.62% |
| Max drawdown | -33.62% | -36.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BPAY and IXN
Explore further