Screener
BPI vs CONY
Grayscale Bitcoin Premium Income ETF vs YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
Key differences
- BPI costs 0.39% less per year.
- CONY is significantly larger than BPI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| BPI | CONY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 1.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $397M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 25.35% | 204.09% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -26.6% | -39.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 38.86% | 57.81% |
| Max drawdown | -47.05% | -63.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BPI and CONY
Explore further