Screener
BRCE vs MFSV
MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF vs MFS Active Value ETF
Key differences
- BRCE costs 0.20% less per year.
- MFSV is significantly larger than BRCE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| BRCE | MFSV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $32M | $443M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +14.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.34% |
| Max drawdown | -8.77% | -12.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BRCE and MFSV
Explore further