Screener
BREE vs EEMA
MFS Blended Research Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Key differences
- EEMA is significantly larger than BREE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BREE follows a active selection strategy; EEMA uses index tracking.
- EEMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BREE | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2026 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +52.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 20.34% |
| Max drawdown | -7.74% | -44.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BREE and EEMA
Explore further