Screener
BREM vs BWZ
iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF vs State Street SPDR Bloomberg Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF
Key differences
- BWZ costs 0.15% less per year.
- BWZ is significantly larger than BREM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BWZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BREM | BWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $38M | $324M |
| Since | 2025 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.02% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +0.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +2.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 7.03% |
| Max drawdown | -4.54% | -24.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BREM and BWZ
Explore further