Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BREM vs EEM

iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

BREM

iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.50%

Fund size

$38M

EEM

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.72%

Fund size

$28.1B

Key differences

  • BREM costs 0.22% less per year.
  • EEM is significantly larger than BREM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • BREM is classified as fixed income, while EEM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BREMEEM
Annual cost (TER)0.50%0.72%
Fund size (AUM)$38M$28.1B
Since20252003
Dividend yield1.91%
Asset classfixed incomeequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1YN/A+46.1%
CAGR 3YN/A+21.9%
CAGR 5YN/A+7.0%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.00
Volatility 1Y19.54%
Max drawdown-4.54%-39.82%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to BREM and EEM