Screener
BREM vs EMBX
iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF vs VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
- BREM costs 0.26% less per year.
- EMBX is significantly larger than BREM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMBX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BREM | EMBX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.76% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $38M | $244M |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.51% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +11.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 5.94% |
| Max drawdown | -4.54% | -37.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BREM and EMBX
Explore further