Screener
BREM vs HIMU
iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF vs iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF
Key differences
- HIMU costs 0.11% less per year.
- HIMU is significantly larger than BREM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BREM covers emerging markets markets; HIMU covers north america.
- HIMU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BREM | HIMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $38M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.16% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 4.92% |
| Max drawdown | -4.54% | -8.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BREM and HIMU
Explore further