Screener
BREM vs ISHG
iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF vs iShares 1-3 Year International Treasury Bond ETF
Key differences
- ISHG costs 0.15% less per year.
- ISHG is significantly larger than BREM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ISHG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BREM | ISHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $38M | $755M |
| Since | 2025 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.44% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +3.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -1.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 6.60% |
| Max drawdown | -4.54% | -25.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BREM and ISHG
Explore further