Screener
BRF vs BZQ
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF vs ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
Key differences
Both BRF and BZQ are equity ETFs. BRF charges 0.60% a year and BZQ 0.95%. The main difference: BRF follows a index tracking strategy; BZQ uses inverse.
- BRF follows a index tracking strategy; BZQ uses inverse.
- BRF costs 0.35% less per year.
- BRF is much larger than BZQ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, BRF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BRF | BZQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24M | $3M |
| Since | 2009 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 5.03% | 7.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | latin america | latin america |
| Strategy | index tracking | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.3% | -46.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.6% | -26.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.5% | -23.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.24 | -0.48 |
| Volatility 1Y | 28.48% | 49.92% |
| Max drawdown | -60.43% | -99.33% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.