Screener
BRTR vs ENHI
iShares Total Return Active ETF vs iShares Enhanced International Active ETF
Key differences
- ENHI costs 0.11% less per year.
- BRTR is significantly larger than ENHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BRTR is classified as fixed income, while ENHI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BRTR follows a index tracking strategy; ENHI uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| BRTR | ENHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $557M | $11M |
| Since | 2023 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 4.69% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.77% | — |
| Max drawdown | -5.07% | -5.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BRTR and ENHI
Explore further