Screener
BSMC vs VONV
Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF vs Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VONV costs 0.65% less per year.
- VONV is significantly larger than BSMC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BSMC follows a active selection strategy; VONV uses index tracking.
- VONV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BSMC | VONV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.71% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $164M | $20.4B |
| Since | 2023 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.94% | 1.68% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.1% | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.75% | 10.92% |
| Max drawdown | -19.14% | -38.21% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BSMC and VONV
Explore further