Screener
BSR vs AMAX
Pacific Select Fund vs Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
Key differences
- BSR costs 0.27% less per year.
- BSR is classified as mixed asset, while AMAX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- BSR follows a active selection strategy; AMAX uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, AMAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BSR | AMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.09% | 1.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $60M |
| Since | 2023 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.02% | 10.63% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.5% | +11.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.0% | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.71% | 9.98% |
| Max drawdown | -15.68% | -16.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BSR and AMAX
Explore further