Screener
BSR vs CAOS
Beacon Selective Risk ETF vs Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
Key differences
BSR is a fixed income ETF, while CAOS is an alternative ETF. BSR charges 1.09% a year and CAOS 0.63%.
- BSR is a fixed income fund, while CAOS is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- BSR follows a active selection strategy; CAOS uses volatility strategy.
- CAOS costs 0.46% less per year.
- CAOS is much larger than BSR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, BSR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CAOS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BSR | CAOS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.09% | 0.63% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37M | $669M |
| Since | 2023 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.02% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | volatility strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.6% | +1.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.8% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.32 | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.78% | 1.53% |
| Max drawdown | -15.68% | -3.60% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.