Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BSR vs KAT

Pacific Select Fund vs Scharf ETF

BSR

PACIFIC SELECT FUND

Beacon Capital Management Inc

Annual cost

1.09%

Fund size

$39M

KAT

Scharf ETF

Scharf Investments

Annual cost

0.75%

Fund size

$688M

Key differences

  • KAT costs 0.34% less per year.
  • KAT is significantly larger than BSR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • BSR is classified as mixed asset, while KAT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BSRKAT
Annual cost (TER)1.09%0.75%
Fund size (AUM)$39M$688M
Since20232011
Dividend yield1.02%0.39%
Asset classmixed assetequity
Region
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+12.5%N/A
CAGR 3Y+8.0%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.33N/A
Volatility 1Y8.71%
Max drawdown-15.68%-9.25%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to BSR and KAT