Screener
BTCC vs HODL
Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF vs VanEck Bitcoin ETF
Key differences
- HODL costs 0.65% less per year.
- HODL is significantly larger than BTCC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BTCC is classified as alternative, while HODL is cryptocurrency — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| BTCC | HODL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 83.34% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | cryptocurrency |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | — |
| CAGR 1Y | -23.3% | -30.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 32.12% | 43.15% |
| Max drawdown | -44.40% | -49.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BTCC and HODL
Explore further