Screener
BTRN vs ORBX
Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF vs Global X Space Tech ETF
Key differences
- ORBX costs 0.45% less per year.
- ORBX is significantly larger than BTRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BTRN is classified as cryptocurrency, while ORBX is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BTRN follows a tactical allocation strategy; ORBX uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| BTRN | ORBX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $13M |
| Since | 2024 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 27.44% | — |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -14.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.06% | — |
| Max drawdown | -36.96% | -13.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BTRN and ORBX
Explore further