Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BTRN vs YBTC

Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF vs Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF

BTRN

Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF

Global X Funds

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$2M

YBTC

Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF

Roundhill Investments

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$158M

Key differences

  • YBTC is significantly larger than BTRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • BTRN is classified as cryptocurrency, while YBTC is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • BTRN follows a tactical allocation strategy; YBTC uses option income.

Side-by-side comparison

BTRNYBTC
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$2M$158M
Since20242024
Dividend yield27.44%78.98%
Asset classcryptocurrencyalternative
Regionnorth america
Strategytactical allocationoption income
CAGR 1Y-14.0%-25.8%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y20.06%38.71%
Max drawdown-36.96%-47.09%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to BTRN and YBTC