Screener
BUFG vs FMAR
FT Vest Buffered Allocation Growth ETF vs FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March
Key differences
- FMAR costs 0.28% less per year.
- FMAR is significantly larger than BUFG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| BUFG | FMAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.13% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $303M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.9% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.7% | +15.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.76% | 5.22% |
| Max drawdown | -17.62% | -14.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BUFG and FMAR
Explore further