Screener
BUFQ vs QMNV
FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF vs FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF – November
Key differences
- QMNV costs 0.10% less per year.
- BUFQ is significantly larger than QMNV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| BUFQ | QMNV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.90% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $62M |
| Since | 2022 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.4% | +21.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.50% | 6.78% |
| Max drawdown | -15.74% | -12.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BUFQ and QMNV
Explore further