Screener
BUFT vs GJAN
FT Vest Buffered Allocation Defensive ETF vs FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - January
Key differences
- GJAN costs 0.36% less per year.
- GJAN is significantly larger than BUFT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, GJAN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BUFT | GJAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.21% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $142M | $467M |
| Since | 2021 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.1% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.05 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.43% | 5.89% |
| Max drawdown | -10.40% | -10.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BUFT and GJAN
Explore further