Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BUSA vs DFUV

Brandes U.S. Value ETF vs Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF

BUSA

Brandes U.S. Value ETF

Brandes

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$292M

DFUV

Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF

Dimensional Fund Advisors

Annual cost

0.21%

Fund size

$14.4B

Key differences

  • DFUV costs 0.39% less per year.
  • DFUV is significantly larger than BUSA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • DFUV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BUSADFUV
Annual cost (TER)0.60%0.21%
Fund size (AUM)$292M$14.4B
Since20231998
Dividend yield1.48%1.41%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+23.9%+33.5%
CAGR 3YN/A+19.3%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A1.05
Volatility 1Y11.96%11.87%
Max drawdown-14.19%-17.60%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to BUSA and DFUV