Screener
BUSA vs FNDA
Brandes U.S. Value ETF vs Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
Key differences
- FNDA costs 0.35% less per year.
- FNDA is significantly larger than BUSA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BUSA follows a active selection strategy; FNDA uses index tracking.
- FNDA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BUSA | FNDA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $292M | $10.2B |
| Since | 2023 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.48% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.9% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.96% | 17.24% |
| Max drawdown | -14.19% | -44.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BUSA and FNDA
Explore further