Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BUSA vs ISCV

Brandes U.S. Value ETF vs iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF

BUSA

Brandes U.S. Value ETF

Brandes

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$292M

ISCV

iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.06%

Fund size

$651M

Key differences

  • ISCV costs 0.54% less per year.
  • BUSA follows a active selection strategy; ISCV uses index tracking.
  • ISCV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BUSAISCV
Annual cost (TER)0.60%0.06%
Fund size (AUM)$292M$651M
Since20232004
Dividend yield1.48%1.90%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+23.9%+29.2%
CAGR 3YN/A+16.4%
CAGR 5YN/A+6.7%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.69
Volatility 1Y11.96%16.48%
Max drawdown-14.19%-51.56%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to BUSA and ISCV