Screener
BWX vs EMTL
State Street SPDR Bloomberg International Treasury Bond ETF vs State Street DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF
Key differences
- BWX costs 0.30% less per year.
- BWX is significantly larger than EMTL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BWX covers global ex us markets; EMTL covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, EMTL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BWX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BWX | EMTL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $90M |
| Since | 2007 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.27% | 4.99% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global ex us | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -1.0% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +0.7% | +6.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -4.3% | +1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.27 | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.81% | 2.22% |
| Max drawdown | -34.00% | -22.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BWX and EMTL
Explore further