Screener
BWX vs ICSH
State Street SPDR Bloomberg International Treasury Bond ETF vs iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- ICSH costs 0.27% less per year.
- ICSH is significantly larger than BWX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BWX covers global ex us markets; ICSH covers north america.
- BWX follows a index tracking strategy; ICSH uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, ICSH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BWX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BWX | ICSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $7.3B |
| Since | 2007 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 2.27% | 4.41% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global ex us | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -1.0% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +0.7% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -4.3% | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.27 | 3.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.81% | 0.41% |
| Max drawdown | -34.00% | -3.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BWX and ICSH
Explore further