Screener
BWZ vs SPTS
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF
Key differences
- SPTS costs 0.32% less per year.
- SPTS is significantly larger than BWZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SPTS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BWZ | SPTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $324M | $6.0B |
| Since | 2009 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.02% | 3.94% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +0.5% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.2% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.0% | +1.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.14 | 0.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.03% | 1.32% |
| Max drawdown | -24.89% | -5.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BWZ and SPTS
Explore further