Screener
BYLD vs NEAR
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF vs iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- BYLD costs 0.12% less per year.
- NEAR is significantly larger than BYLD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BYLD follows a index tracking strategy; NEAR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| BYLD | NEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.13% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $387M | $4.3B |
| Since | 2014 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 5.35% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.5% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.3% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.3% | +3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.85% | 1.37% |
| Max drawdown | -14.75% | -9.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BYLD and NEAR
Explore further