Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BYRE vs REET

Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF vs iShares Global REIT ETF

BYRE

Principal Real Estate Active Opportunities ETF

Principal Funds

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$25M

REET

iShares Global REIT ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.14%

Fund size

$4.8B

Key differences

  • REET costs 0.46% less per year.
  • REET is significantly larger than BYRE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • BYRE follows a active selection strategy; REET uses index tracking.
  • REET has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BYREREET
Annual cost (TER)0.60%0.14%
Fund size (AUM)$25M$4.8B
Since20222014
Dividend yield2.46%3.36%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobal
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+12.9%+17.6%
CAGR 3Y+10.1%+10.3%
CAGR 5YN/A+3.6%
Sharpe 3Y0.470.48
Volatility 1Y12.34%12.04%
Max drawdown-25.70%-44.59%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to BYRE and REET