Screener
BZQ vs BRF
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped vs VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
Both BZQ and BRF are equity ETFs. BZQ charges 0.95% a year and BRF 0.60%. The main difference: BZQ follows a inverse strategy; BRF uses index tracking.
- BZQ follows a inverse strategy; BRF uses index tracking.
- BRF costs 0.35% less per year.
- BRF is much larger than BZQ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, BRF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BZQ | BRF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $24M |
| Since | 2009 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 7.58% | 5.03% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | latin america | latin america |
| Strategy | inverse | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -46.5% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | -26.6% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -23.5% | -2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.48 | 0.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 49.92% | 28.48% |
| Max drawdown | -99.33% | -60.43% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.