Screener
CAFX vs SLQD
Congress Intermediate Bond ETF vs iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SLQD costs 0.29% less per year.
- SLQD is significantly larger than CAFX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CAFX follows a active selection strategy; SLQD uses index tracking.
- SLQD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CAFX | SLQD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $325M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2024 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 3.99% | 4.25% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.91% | 1.49% |
| Max drawdown | -2.63% | -12.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CAFX and SLQD
Explore further