Screener
CAML vs ACSG
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF vs American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF
Key differences
- ACSG costs 0.16% less per year.
- CAML is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| CAML | ACSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $376M | $15M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.65% | — |
| Max drawdown | -21.06% | -13.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CAML and ACSG
Explore further