Screener
CAML vs BGRO
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF vs iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF
Key differences
- BGRO costs 0.10% less per year.
- CAML is significantly larger than BGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CAML is classified as equity, while BGRO is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| CAML | BGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $376M | $9M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.04% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.0% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.65% | 18.04% |
| Max drawdown | -21.06% | -24.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CAML and BGRO
Explore further