Screener
CAML vs FTGS
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF vs First Trust Growth Strength ETF
Key differences
- FTGS costs 0.05% less per year.
- FTGS is significantly larger than CAML — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CAML follows a active selection strategy; FTGS uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| CAML | FTGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $376M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.09% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.0% | +12.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.65% | 13.50% |
| Max drawdown | -21.06% | -19.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CAML and FTGS
Explore further