Screener
CAOS vs BSR
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF vs Beacon Selective Risk ETF
Key differences
CAOS is an alternative ETF, while BSR is a fixed income ETF. CAOS charges 0.63% a year and BSR 1.09%.
- CAOS is an alternative fund, while BSR is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- CAOS follows a volatility strategy strategy; BSR uses active selection.
- CAOS costs 0.46% less per year.
- CAOS is much larger than BSR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, BSR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CAOS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CAOS | BSR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.63% | 1.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $669M | $37M |
| Since | 2013 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.02% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | volatility strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +1.9% | +11.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.3% | +7.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.19 | 0.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.53% | 8.78% |
| Max drawdown | -3.60% | -15.68% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.