Skip to content
Screener

CAOS vs CCOR

Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF vs Core Alternative ETF

CAOS

Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF

Annual cost

0.63%

Fund size

$669M

CCOR

Core Alternative ETF

Annual cost

1.29%

Fund size

$27M

Key differences

Both CAOS and CCOR are alternative ETFs. CAOS charges 0.63% a year and CCOR 1.29%. The main difference: CAOS follows a volatility strategy strategy; CCOR uses option income.

  • CAOS follows a volatility strategy strategy; CCOR uses option income.
  • CAOS costs 0.66% less per year.
  • CAOS is much larger than CCOR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, CAOS has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

CAOSCCOR
Annual cost (TER)0.63%1.29%
Fund size (AUM)$669M$27M
Since20132017
Dividend yield0.00%1.10%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyvolatility strategyoption income
CAGR 1Y+1.9%-3.9%
CAGR 3Y+4.3%-1.5%
CAGR 5YN/A-2.1%
Sharpe 3Y0.19-0.46
Volatility 1Y1.53%7.22%
Max drawdown-3.60%-22.99%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all income funds

Similar to CAOS and CCOR