Screener
CATF vs FDG
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF vs American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
Key differences
- CATF costs 0.18% less per year.
- FDG is significantly larger than CATF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CATF is classified as fixed income, while FDG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| CATF | FDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.27% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75M | $387M |
| Since | 2024 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 3.55% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.0% | +35.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +32.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.14% | 17.88% |
| Max drawdown | -4.83% | -43.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CATF and FDG
Explore further