Screener
CATH vs KRMA
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF vs Global X Conscious Companies ETF
Key differences
- CATH costs 0.14% less per year.
- CATH is significantly larger than KRMA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, CATH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CATH | KRMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.43% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $116M |
| Since | 2016 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.80% | 2.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.6% | +28.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.1% | +11.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.32% | 12.33% |
| Max drawdown | -33.95% | -36.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CATH and KRMA
Explore further