Screener
CATH vs OEF
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF vs iShares S&P 100 ETF
Key differences
- OEF costs 0.09% less per year.
- OEF is significantly larger than CATH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, OEF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- OEF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CATH | OEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $19.6B |
| Since | 2016 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.80% | 0.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.6% | +33.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | +25.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.1% | +16.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 1.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.32% | 12.86% |
| Max drawdown | -33.95% | -31.44% |
Similar to CATH and OEF
Explore further