Screener
CBOJ vs YBTC
Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January vs Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF
Key differences
- CBOJ costs 0.26% less per year.
- YBTC is significantly larger than CBOJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CBOJ follows a structured outcome strategy; YBTC uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| CBOJ | YBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $158M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 3.15% | 78.98% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.9% | -27.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.94% | 38.70% |
| Max drawdown | -8.13% | -47.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CBOJ and YBTC
Explore further