Screener
CBXA vs CWB
Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Struc vs State Street SPDR Bloomberg Convertible Securities ETF
Key differences
CBXA is a cryptocurrency ETF, while CWB is a fixed income ETF. CBXA charges 0.69% a year and CWB 0.40%.
- CBXA is a cryptocurrency fund, while CWB is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- CBXA follows a active selection strategy; CWB uses index tracking.
- CWB costs 0.29% less per year.
- CWB is much larger than CBXA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- CWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CBXA | CWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $6.2B |
| Since | 2025 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 2.36% | 1.37% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -23.5% | +29.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.05% | 14.77% |
| Max drawdown | -28.98% | -32.06% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.