Screener
CCNR vs ENHI
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF vs iShares Enhanced International Active ETF
Key differences
- ENHI costs 0.12% less per year.
- CCNR is significantly larger than ENHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCNR is classified as equity, while ENHI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCNR | ENHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $394M | $11M |
| Since | 2024 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 2.77% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +72.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.69% | — |
| Max drawdown | -20.06% | -5.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCNR and ENHI
Explore further