Screener
CCNR vs KAT
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
Both CCNR and KAT are equity ETFs. CCNR charges 0.39% a year and KAT 0.75%. The main difference: CCNR costs 0.36% less per year.
- CCNR costs 0.36% less per year.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCNR | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $393M | $682M |
| Since | 2024 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.78% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +60.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.43% | — |
| Max drawdown | -20.06% | -9.25% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.