Screener
CCNR vs RFFC
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF vs ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- CCNR costs 0.09% less per year.
- CCNR is significantly larger than RFFC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCNR covers global markets; RFFC covers north america.
- RFFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCNR | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $394M | $29M |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.77% | 0.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +72.9% | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.69% | 12.11% |
| Max drawdown | -20.06% | -36.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCNR and RFFC
Explore further