Screener
CCOM vs XOP
Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
Key differences
- XOP costs 0.64% less per year.
- XOP is significantly larger than CCOM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCOM covers emerging markets markets; XOP covers north america.
- CCOM follows a active selection strategy; XOP uses index tracking.
- XOP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOM | XOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $105M | $3.6B |
| Since | 2026 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.83% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +39.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +17.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.50 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 27.49% |
| Max drawdown | -4.45% | -82.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Explore further