Screener
CCOR vs ADPV
Core Alternative ETF vs Adaptiv Select ETF
Key differences
- ADPV costs 0.29% less per year.
- ADPV is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCOR is classified as alternative, while ADPV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; ADPV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, ADPV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | ADPV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28M | $171M |
| Since | 2017 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 0.68% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.9% | +36.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | +26.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.56 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.92% | 24.05% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -22.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCOR and ADPV
Explore further