Screener
CCOR vs CAOS
Core Alternative ETF vs Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
Key differences
Both CCOR and CAOS are alternative ETFs. CCOR charges 1.29% a year and CAOS 0.63%. The main difference: CCOR follows a option income strategy; CAOS uses volatility strategy.
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; CAOS uses volatility strategy.
- CAOS costs 0.66% less per year.
- CAOS is much larger than CCOR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, CAOS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | CAOS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 0.63% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $27M | $669M |
| Since | 2017 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | volatility strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | -3.9% | +1.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | -1.5% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.46 | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.22% | 1.53% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -3.60% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.