Screener
CCOR vs EMPB
Core Alternative ETF vs Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF
Key differences
- CCOR costs 0.92% less per year.
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; EMPB uses active selection.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | EMPB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 2.21% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28M | $18M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 0.82% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.9% | +21.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.56 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.92% | 11.41% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -7.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCOR and EMPB
Explore further